Deaf Radio Shack DX-390





While visiting my in-laws I worked on a Radio Shack DX-390. My father in law bought it off of eBay to do some shortwave listening and found that the HF receiver was deaf. The DX-390 is known for getting a deaf receiver on HF due to a static on the antenna damaging the Q1 front end FET. Originally there was a 2SK152 as Q1. The DX-390 has little to no antenna static discharge protection and killed the 2SK152. It was not picking up anything. I often go too deep and try hard solutions too early so I wanted to try to see what the sensitivity was before replacing the part. I brought my antenna analyzer with me as I was planning on making some kind of wire antenna to play with the Yaesu FT-817 I also brought. My father in law is also an Amateur radio operator. The nice thing about the antenna analyzer is it can also work as a signal generator for some high level testing. 

I set the antenna analyzer to near 7MHz and just let it run with some wire hooked up to the center pin of the connector. My Ft-817 picked it up very well. The DX-390 not so much. It was barely picking the signal at max RF gain and volume. I don’t know that it had any S units. It could not pick up any SW stations either. 

My father in law had already looked up the issues and bought a replacement FET. A 2SK291. Another ham’s blog, W9JES, it shows a solution using the 2SK291 and 4 1N4148 diodes. Q1 can be replaced by the 2SK291, the only 1 had with it was the pin out of the 2SK291 has the drain and source reversed in reference to the original 2SK152. When I replaced it, I just twisted the leads to end up in the right spot on the PCB. Once it was replaced two 1N4148 diodes were soldered in parallel and opposing directions across the antenna pad and the ground pad. Two more similarly across the the external antenna pad and ground. The diodes are to protect against static on the antenna. 

Once replaced it was able to pick up stations and had a full S meter with the antenna analyzer running next to it with no antenna connected. 

Afterwards we hooked up a long wire external antenna and listened to some 40m and 20m CW and SSB. The DX-390 has a BFO but it’s pretty hard to tune on SSB.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Yaesu FT-100 YSK-100 Separation Kit

Image
If you are looking for the YSK-100 or other separation kit. This is the right place. Yaesu no longer makes their CT-5L cable. There are a few options: 1. Buy used. They sometimes come up on Ebay, or other resale methods. but they are usually expensive or connected to a radio purchase. 2. Buy third party. There are a few options for this. I provide one of these. I have a FT-100, a FT-8100, and a FT-8500. They all use the same cable the CT-5L. I made an set of adapters that lets you use your own Ethernet cable to connect the head to the body. The adapters screw on to the head and body of the radio using the original interface. There is no modification needed on the radio.   There is a bracket which is now discontinued, Yaesu part number MMB-72. The MMB-72 is quick disconnectable. The head unit slides on and snaps in place. If you cannot get a MMB-72 bracket I also have made some 3D printed brackets to fit the adapters I also have a 3D Printed Bracket that fits the small adapters, shown b
Read more

Yaesu FT-900 YSK-900 Alternative Separation Kit

Image
 My newest project has been a separation kit for the Yaesu FT-900. This kit is a little different, it uses 8 contacts, I was able to use the same basic design as the other Yaesu separation kits and the same Ethernet connectors. I was able to modify the FT-100 head bracket model so I did not have to start from nothing. The brackets are compatible with the AMPS standard holes, ie, the hole pattern that is  on a 38mm x 30mm rectangle. Theses are common for attaching a LIDO mount, or RAM ball.  If you would like your own, please email to Contact@radiorework.com
Read more

Yaesu FT-90 Separation kit /YSK-90

Image
 I have been working on a separation kit for the Yaesu FT-90. It’s very small and has been a challenge. The biggest issue it really the size. Finding four conductor cables with a sufficiently small diameter has been hard. I have been trying to make it fit the original form factor. I think I am pretty close to having one complete. I have had a few functional prototypes but the wire size remains an issue.  I have tried using the wire from a TRRS extension cable and that seems to work but the conductors which are really just headphone cables seem pretty delicate.  I may make a version that abandons the size and uses a 4P4C RJ type jack. It would not need to be too much larger. And all my other kits use them, I think it might work by adding a little depth to the head bracket to be able to use a RJ-12 or similar size jack. If you are interested in getting one of these once I have finished creating them. Send me an email to contact@radiorework.com to get on the mailing list of interested peo
Read more